UC-371
Supplier PPAP and Part Submission Review
Reads each PPAP pack, checks dimensional results, capability studies and control plans against the drawing, and flags what fails.
TBDBuild Duration
XXXXIndicative ROI
XXXXBuild Cost
XXXXValue
The Challenge
A weak part submission clears approval and the defect surfaces at launch, when a fix costs far more. It persists because reviewers read hundreds of pages under launch pressure and no two suppliers format alike.
How It Works
- Reads PPAP packs, part drawings, control plans, dimensional reports and capability studies.
- Checks each element against the drawing and submission level, scoring completeness.
- Returns a marked-up findings list to the supplier quality engineer before approval.
What It Removes
- Page-by-page reading of PPAP submission packs
- Manual transcription of dimensional results
- Chasing suppliers for missing submission elements
Input Data RequirementsPPAP packs, part drawings and specifications, control plans, PFMEA documents, dimensional and capability reports, supplier quality history
Output FormatPer-submission findings list citing the failing elements, an approval readiness score, and a supplier submission trend
“We approve packs we have not fully read because the launch date will not move for us”