UC-489
Improve Duplicate Spend and Bases to reduce cost, risk and delay
Fills the Integration page: duplicate spend, overlapping bases, and what each merge is worth.
TBDBuild Duration
XXXXIndicative ROI
XXXXBuild Cost
XXXXValue
The Challenge
The opportunity is to eliminate the same part at two prices, two bases serving one basin, and a saving argued from a spreadsheet. The proposed workflow is source-linked, but the current operating baseline and financial value remain illustrative until validated with the client.
How It Works
- One engine reads both companies' purchase orders, contracts, vendor terms and warehouse holdings.
- It finds the same part bought at two prices, the same service contracted twice, and the bases and warehouses whose catchments overlap.
- Each consolidation comes out priced, sequenced against contract expiry dates, with a named owner and the approval it needs.
What It Removes
- The same part at two prices
- Two bases serving one basin
- A saving argued from a spreadsheet
Input Data RequirementsRelevant operational records, contracts, transactions, schedules, documents and outcome history named in the source proposal
Output FormatDashboard showing duplicate spend, overlapping bases, and what each merge is worth.
“It shows me the duplicate spend and what it costs to stop, contract by contract.”